Re. Kippe og Scheel. I'd ask myself the following questions:
Has Kippe been more vocal\authorative since getting the captaincy?
Does Haglund want to play a higher back 4 which would expose Kippes lack of pace?
Does Haglund see that Steinhard is an adequate back-up?
Could Hoibråten physically mix it with much larger strikers in the TL?
Was Scheel as good as\is as good as LSK believed he was when we signed him?
Have Kippe and Scheel mixed as well as hoped? Do they function as a pair?
Is Scheel a better player in a back 5, than a back 4?
Could Scheel be used anywhere else on the pitch, if injuries\suspension were to set in?
We conceed nigh on 3 goals a game. Which is our form from last season. And its relegation form, in all honesty.
No-one is saying that Kippe and Steinhard should be given a walking stick and sent off to the knackers yard which is Strømmen, but there is a reason as to what Haglund is doing.
In Haglund we trust.
Has Kippe been more vocal\authorative since getting the captaincy?
Does Haglund want to play a higher back 4 which would expose Kippes lack of pace?
Does Haglund see that Steinhard is an adequate back-up?
Could Hoibråten physically mix it with much larger strikers in the TL?
Was Scheel as good as\is as good as LSK believed he was when we signed him?
Have Kippe and Scheel mixed as well as hoped? Do they function as a pair?
Is Scheel a better player in a back 5, than a back 4?
Could Scheel be used anywhere else on the pitch, if injuries\suspension were to set in?
We conceed nigh on 3 goals a game. Which is our form from last season. And its relegation form, in all honesty.
No-one is saying that Kippe and Steinhard should be given a walking stick and sent off to the knackers yard which is Strømmen, but there is a reason as to what Haglund is doing.
In Haglund we trust.
Kommentar